SMSF Advantages and Disadvantages
A SMSF can become a powerful vehicle for your retirement. We include some SMSF advantages and disadvantages in order to help you get a better understanding of an SMSF before making a final call on whether it is right for you or not. You may also need to discuss the issues with other potential member(s) in your SMSF.
Advantages
- Many business owners hold their business premises in their SMSFs simply for asset protection, succession planning (for the members/beneficiaries), minimising tax, and security of tenancy. If your SMSF is the landlord of your business premises, your business would have to pay rent at market value to your SMSF. In return, the net rental income (after deducting allowable deductions) received by your fund would be taxed at the concessional rate of 15%, and would typically benefit from many of the usual tax breaks available to landlords – including tax deductions for interest on a property loan (applicable to complying funds; a non-complying fund will be taxed at the top marginal tax rate, which is currently 45%).
- With an SMSF, you and the other members are very much in control of making investment decisions as well as ensuring no mistakes are made in running your fund. Unlike large super funds, where sometimes it is frustrating to wait for the correction of your fund balance or for rolling over to another fund, an SMSF allows you to act more quickly and directly.
- SMSFs pool funds from members, and these collective funds have more buying power than a single person could afford on their own to buy an investment asset, such as a property. An SMSF can also apply for a loan to make investment purchases (strict conditions apply), whereas larger super funds are generally not allowed to gear their investments.
- SMSF members have the ability to change their investment portfolio more quickly compared to large super funds, as sometimes there is a lag between when investment changes are requested and when those changes are executed.
- An SMSF enables members to invest in ways that are generally not available in most large super funds. For example, an SMSF can hold direct property, unlisted shares, artwork and other less-common investments, or it can invest in a selection of investment fund managers and direct shares — which large funds may or may not offer, depending on their investment portfolio.
- There is the potential to reduce the administrative costs associated with running an SMSF. For example, an SMSF with a larger fund balance (say $200,000 or more) may pay lower fees as a percentage of its balance compared with large super funds, which usually charge fees based on a percentage of the total fund balance.
- Ability to manage or eliminate Capital Gain Tax (CGT) event. You can eliminate the CGT liability by deferring the disposal of an asset until the asset is backing the payment of a pension.
- Subject to anti-avoidance provisions in the Bankruptcy Act, fund-held business premises are generally inaccessible to trustees in bankruptcy should a member get into future financial troubles.
- Flexible estate planning, a member aged 60 or over can withdraw benefits tax-free before death to avoid potential death benefits tax which may be payable to beneficiaries.
Disadvantages
- Operating an SMSF is quite time-consuming even when using professional SMSF administration services. Members have to manage the day-to-day operation of their funds. By contrast, a large fund takes over all of the administration and many of the day-to-day investment decisions of all the members’ funds, including yours.
- The sole purpose of providing retirement benefits to the members, this follows with stringent restrictions on their investments (such as no personal usage pre-retirement, no loans to members and their relatives, and related parties investment must be below 5% of the fund’s value).
- Ideally, SMSF members should really understand the basics of sound investment practices, for instance, how an appropriately diversified investment portfolio can spread their risks and the potential for returns, as well as associated investment costs and tax implication.
- Poor risk diversity (such as holding a single asset) may intensifies the risk when a sole asset is geared.
- ATO have the power remove a fund’s complying status to non-complying fund which is taxed at the highest marginal rate (currently 45%), plus trustees can face civil and criminal sanctions for serious breaches.
- High costs for SMSFs that have small balances to bear the overhead costs associated in running the SMSF.
- Apart from signing documents presented to them by dominant member(s) of an SMSF, passive member(s) typically have no involvement with the fund. And unfortunately, passive members usually do little to safeguard their superannuation interests.
- Risk of losing interest when the members unable to boost the balance as planned, and become too frail as they’re getting older.
Like many other investment decision, planning and discussion with related members would be an essential part before deciding to step into an SMSF decision.
We will put some more articles about SMSF to broaden your knowledge. Please feel free to contact our office.
If you have any inquiry. Thank you.
